The Office of the President announced a new Adoption Protocol last week that they would like to take effect here in Guatemala. I read the English translation provided by an adoption advocate who was admittedly against the proposal. I haven’t been able to get a direct copy of the edict. ( I have been a bit busy with conferences and medical missions hosting) You may have heard small whisperings that the adoptions of cute children from this country are not without their dark side. The President and his wife have tried to get some regulations put into effect for the last few years without much effect. They have tried to get the legislature to write laws in conformance with the Hague Treaty. This treaty was recently ratified by the U.S. and will soon have a direct affect on adoptions from Guatemala, regardless of Guatemala’s actions. It’s implementation in other countries has practically stopped international adoptions. Failing that they have now tried to claim that existing laws allow for the formation of a “Protocol” that doesn’t make a new law, but explains how the various parts of the government should behave concerning adoptions.
Needless to say, the Adoption advocates are up in arms. Well, not all of them. Shyrel and I believe the best possible option for a child who has lost the possibility of living with his or her birth family is adoption into a loving, Christ centered family. But we are not ready to say that this protocol is a bad thing. It’s just not that simple here.
My initial sense is that the government, and those opposed to this new Protocol are both right.
The Government’s case: Unregulated Adoptions are a source of shame here. We personally see and feel the negative reputation that adoptions, and children’s homes who do them have. We hear the comments, like the Lawyer who told us a couple of years ago: “ I don’t defend drug traffickers and don’t handle adoptions”. Guatemala is a free market economy. We Americans have good feelings about free market, and bad feelings about restrictions and government interference. But in the states, that freedom is tempered by a cultural foundation of …I don’t know what it is, but you can sense it fairly quickly. So, here, free market means everything is negotiable. From the policeman who will let you go for a small compensation, to the municipal airfield controller who takes their informal tax from the Colombian cocaine plains, to the coyotes who promise to take illegals through Mexico and to the states for $5,000, everything is business. If there is a profit to be made, someone here will figure out a way to make it. Obviously, there must be something other than the profit motive to regulate a human society. Prostitution and slavery come to mind as extreme examples. So here is the problem: what separates the proper placement of a needy child with a loving family from the sale of a child to a potentially dangerous situation? How do you know? Trust of the lawyer who you have paid thousands of dollars because he said “trust me?” The joke in New York City is you can tell a mob guy by asking about organized crime. If he responds by saying “there is no Mafia” you have found your made man. In Guatemalan Adoptions, I am beginning to think the only people who “Adoptions are sure and clean” are in the Cartel. The U.S. Embassy is the strongest “filter mechanism” to ensure against nefarious adoptions. I hope their filters are better than the DEA’s or the INS. The Guatemalan President and his wife, Wendy, rightly so, feel they should bear more of the responsibility for protecting children born in this country.
The opponents to this Protocol: Their claim is that historically, the most corrupt and money grabbing part of Guatemalan society has been the government. I have been really impressed with Oscar Berger’s attempts to clean up the government, in many ways that he will never be acknowledged for. But the previous President is said to have stolen 40% of the Gross National Product for each of the 4 years he was in office. Several heads of the National Police were put in Jail last week. It has been said that we do not have the best politicians that money can buy, but they can be bought. Foxes guarding chicken coops comes to mind.
What’s the answer? Someone said that Money is the root of all sorts of evils. Maybe he had a point. When the actual costs associated with a baby becoming a U.S. citizen are approximately $8,000, including airfare for the parent’s 2 visits to Guatemala, and Parents spending upwards of $30,000 there is a lot of profit to be had. Two things happen in that atmosphere: People whose only motive is profit are drawn to it, and people whose original motive was altruistic start thinking about all the good things they can do with that money, and soon are dependent on that “profit”, making decisions that are no longer purely based on what is best for the child and the new parents. Even Christian Agencies and their “clients” seem to become very adversarial very quickly.
What if we made the precious, eternal transference of a child to a family a non-economic issue? What if churches facilitated adoptions, like they facilitate Sunday school? What if the home study person in the states was paid a fee to evaluate the family, regardless of acceptance? What if Missionaries or agencies were not funded by parents, but completely apart, so that decisions were not encumbered with paying the rent? There would be a lot of problems beyond the purely economic. But it might be a start.